This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Archer project.
Re: ptrace improvement ideas (QPassSignals)
On 02/16, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 02/16, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > It's already desireable to restructure
> > the ptrace implementation details so that ptrace-related storage is not
> > allocated when ptrace is not being used,
> Yes. IIRC, we already had the patches, but right now I can't recall
> if they were complete (most probably yes, except I am not sure about
> task->ptrace member). I'll try to find this series.
It turns out, it was complete but it should be changed a bit.
> Probably this is the first thing we should do.
Yes, I think this can help to implement the new features.
But there is a problem. If we want PTRACE_ATTCH_ALL_THREADS (and iiuc
we do want) we have to use GFP_ATOMIC to allocate ptrace_state under
I wonder if we can invent a sleepable lock. Actually it is also needed
for cgroups, the guys from google are going to add the rw_semaphore into
signal_struct. But it depends on CONFIG_CGROUPS and doesn't cover exit.
Yes, yes, I am talking about implementation details again...