This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Archer project.
Re: Q: multiple inferiors, all-stop && vCont
On 07/26, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Right now I am trying to understand why gdb doesn't use 'vCont:c'
> but sends 'c' instead. And yes, I report 'vCont;c;t' to 'vCont?'.
OK. After I read remote_vcont_resume()->remote_vcont_probe() path
I understand why 'vCont;c;t' doesn't work. Contrary to what the
documentation says it is all or nothing. Except 't' has the separate
remote_state->support_vCont_t flag. Very strange.