This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Archer project.
Re: Expressions Status and Oustanding Tasks
Tom> Yeah, stuff like: foo->operator+(5)
Keith> Is this really how we intend to support operators? I would much rather
Keith> have "print foo + 5" just work correctly. This seems to work now (with
Keith> any gdb):
We want to implement as much of C++ expression parsing as we possibly
can. So, we want both -- the weird thing I wrote above is actually
valid C++. Look for mentions of operator-function-id here:
I say as much as possible because there is reason to believe that some
template cases are not doable in a debugger.