[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
Automake supports Libtool libraries in two ways. It can help you to build the Libtool libraries themselves, and also to build executables which link against Libtool libraries.
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
Continuing in the spirit of making Libtool library management look like native static archive management, converting a ‘Makefile.am’ from static archive use to Libtool library use is a matter of changing the name of the library, and adding a Libtool prefix somewhere. For example, a ‘Makefile.am’ for building a static archive might be:
lib_LIBRARIES = libshell.a libshell_a_SOURCES = object.c subr.c symbol.c |
This would build a static archive called ‘libshell.a’ consisting of the objects ‘object.o’, ‘subr.o’ and ‘bar.o’. To build an equivalent Libtool library from the same objects, you change this to:
lib_LTLIBRARIES = libshell.la libshell_la_SOURCES = object.c subr.c symbol.c |
The only changes are that the library is now named with a .la
suffix, and the Automake primary is now ‘LTLIBRARIES’.
Note that since the name of the library has changed, you also need to
use ‘libshell_la_SOURCES’, and similarly for any other Automake
macros which used to refer to the old archive. As for native libraries,
Libtool library names should begin with the letters ‘lib’, so that
the linker will be able to find them when passed ‘-l’ options.
Often you will need to add extra objects to the library as determined by
configure
, but this is also a mechanical process. When
building native libraries, the ‘Makefile.am’ would have contained:
libshell_a_LDADD = xmalloc.o @LIBOBJS@ |
To add the same objects to an equivalent Libtool library would require:
libshell_la_LDADD = xmalloc.lo @LTLIBOBJS@ |
That is, objects added to a Libtool library must be Libtool objects
(with a .lo
) suffix. You should add code to ‘configure.in’
to ensure that ‘LTALLOCA’ and ‘LTLIBOBJS’ are set
appropriately, See section Extra Macros for Libtool. Automake will
take care of generating appropriate rules for building the Libtool
objects mentioned in an ‘LDADD’ macro.
If you want to pass any additional flags to libtool
when it is
building, you use the ‘LDFLAGS’ macro for that library, like this:
libshell_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 1:0:1 |
For a detailed list of all the available options, see (Libtool)Link mode section ‘Link mode’ in The Libtool Manual.
Libtool’s use of ‘-rpath’ has been a point of contention for some users, since it prevents you from moving shared libraries to another location in the library search path. Or, at least, if you do, all of the executables that were linked with ‘-rpath’ set to the old location will need to be relinked.
We (the Libtool maintainers) assert that always using ‘-rpath’ is a good thing: Mainly because you can guarantee that any executable linked with ‘-rpath’ will find the correct version of the library, in the rpath directory, that was intended when the executable was linked. Library versions can still be managed correctly, and will be found by the run time loader, by installing newer versions to the same directory. Additionally, it is much harder for a malicious user to leave a modified copy of system library in a directory that someone might wish to list in their ‘LD_LIBRARY_PATH’ in the hope that some code they have written will be executed unexpectedly.
The argument against ‘-rpath’ was instigated when one of the GNU/Linux distributions moved some important system libraries to another directory to make room for a different version, and discovered that all of the executables that relied on these libraries and were linked with Libtool no longer worked. Doing this was, arguably, bad system management – the new libraries should have been placed in a new directory, and the old libraries left alone. Refusing to use ‘-rpath’ in case you want to restructure the system library directories is a very weak argument.
The ‘-rpath’ option (which is required for Libtool libraries) is
automatically supplied by automake
based on the installation
directory specified with the library primary.
lib_LTLIBRARIES = libshell.la |
The example would use the value of the make macro $(libdir)
as
the argument to ‘-rpath’, since that is where the library will be
installed.
A few of the other options you can use in the library ‘LDFLAGS’ are:
Modern architectures allow us to create shared libraries with undefined
symbols, provided those symbols are resolved (usually by the executable
which loads the library) at runtime. Unfortunately, there are some
architectures (notably AIX and Windows) which require that
all symbols are resolved when the library is linked. If you know
that your library has no unresolved symbols at link time, then adding
this option tells libtool
that it will be able to build a
shared library, even on architectures which have this requirement.
Using this option will force libtool
to build only a static
archive for this library.
On occasion, it is desirable to encode the release number of a library
into its name. By specifying the release number with this option,
libtool
will build a library that does this, but will break
binary compatibility for each change of the release number. By breaking
binary compatibility this way, you negate the possibility of fixing bugs
in installed programs by installing an updated shared library. You
should probably be using ‘-version-info’ instead.
libshell_la_LDFLAGS = -release 27 |
The above fragment might create a library called ‘libshell-27.so.0.0.0’ for example.
Set the version number of the library according to the native versioning rules based on the numbers supplied, See section Library Versioning. You need to be aware that the library version number is for the use of the runtime loader, and is completely unrelated to the release number of your project. If you really want to encode the project release into the library, you can use ‘-release’ to do it.
If this option is not supplied explicitly, it defaults to ‘-version-info 0:0:0’.
Historically, the default behaviour of Libtool was as if ‘-no-undefined’ was always passed on the command line, but it proved to be annoying to developers who had to constantly turn it off so that their ELF libraries could be featureful. Now it has to be defined explicitly if you need it.
There are is a tradeoff:
- If you don’t specify ‘-no-undefined’, then Libtool will not build shared libraries on platforms which don’t allow undefined symbols at link time for such a library.
- It is only safe to specify this flag when you know for certain that all of the libraries symbols are defined at link time, otherwise the ‘-no-undefined’ link will appear to work until it is tried on a platform which requires all symbols to be defined. Libtool will try to link the shared library in this case (because you told it that you have not left any undefined symbols), but the link will fail, because there are undefined symbols in spite of what you told Libtool.
For more information about this topic, see Portable Library Design.
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
Once you have set up your ‘Makefile.am’ to create some Libtool
libraries. you will want to link an executable against them. You can do
this easily with automake
by using the program’s qualified
‘LDADD’ macro:
bin_PROGRAMS = shell shell_SOURCES = shell.c token.l shell_LDADD = libshell.la |
This will choose either the static or shared archive from the
‘libshell.la’ Libtool library depending on the target host and any
Libtool mode switches mentioned in the ‘Makefile.am’, or passed to
configure
. The chosen archive will be linked with any objects
generated from the listed sources to make an executable. Note that the
executable itself is a hidden file, and that in its place
libtool
creates a wrapper script, See section Executing Uninstalled Binaries.
As with the Libtool libraries, you can pass additional switches for the
libtool
invocation in the qualified ‘LDFLAGS’ macros to
control how the shell
executable is linked:
Always choose static libraries where possible, and try to create a completely statically linked executable.
If you really want to use this flag on some targets, you can pass it in
an ‘LDFLAGS’ macro. This is not overridden by the
configure
‘--enable-fast-install’ switch. Executables
built with this flag will not need relinking to be executed from the
build tree on platforms which might have otherwise required it.
You should use this option for any executables which are used only for testing, or for generating other files and are consequently never installed. By specifying this option, you are telling Libtool that the executable it links will only ever be executed from where it is built in the build tree. Libtool is usually able to considerably speed up the link process for such executables.
This switch is similar to ‘-all-static’, except that it applies to only the uninstalled Libtool libraries in the build tree. Where possible the static archive from these libraries is used, but the default linking mode is used for libraries which are already installed.
When debugging an executable, for example, it can be useful to temporarily use:
shell_LDFLAGS = -all-static |
You can pass Libtool link options to all of the targets in a given directory by using the unadorned ‘LDFLAGS’ macro:
LDFLAGS = -staticThis is best reserved for directories which have targets of the same type, all Libtool libraries or all executables for instance. The technique still works in a mixed target type directory, and
libtool
will ignore switches which don’t make sense for particular targets. It is less maintainable, and makes it harder to understand what is going on if you do that though.
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] |
This document was generated by Ben Elliston on July 10, 2015 using texi2html 1.82.