This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: generalized unique element
- From: "Laura Jenkins" <xsl_list at hotmail dot com>
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:40:04 +0000
- Subject: RE: [xsl] generalized unique element
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Thanks David,Stuart,Mike,kalyan
Sorted my problem out.
From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
Reply-To: xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
To: <xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com>
Subject: RE: [xsl] generalized unique element
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 17:09:07 +0100
> Mike> It all gets easier in XPath 2.0, where you can write
> Mike>
> Mike> <xsl:if test="every $x in preceding-sibling::*
> Mike> satisfies name($x) != name(.)">
>
> Are you _sure_ that's easier than
>
> <xsl:if test="preceding-sibling::*[name(.)=name(current())]">
>
Well, I can't say it's a simpler solution; but in my case, this
afternoon, it was a solution that I found more easily.
Michael Kay
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list