This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: XML to plain text : which processor best to use ?


> but also I need to be
> able to manage perfectly blank spaces and carriage returns.
> So I was wondering which processor to choose (Xalan, XT, others...) for
> doing this, with eventually some special extensions (OutputHandler ?) for
> managing correctly carriage returns and blank spaces. It seems that most
> processors does not handle carriage returns very well without extensions...

The XSLT standard gives you full control over white space output without
using any extensions. So this shouldn't need to be a factor in
determining which processor to use.

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]