This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: XML to plain text : which processor best to use ?
- From: David Carlisle <davidc at nag dot co dot uk>
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 16:55:06 +0100
- Subject: Re: [xsl] XML to plain text : which processor best to use ?
- References: <OFF4E81333.717128D1-ONC1256BF4.0050D5C6@bnpparibas.com>
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> but also I need to be
> able to manage perfectly blank spaces and carriage returns.
> So I was wondering which processor to choose (Xalan, XT, others...) for
> doing this, with eventually some special extensions (OutputHandler ?) for
> managing correctly carriage returns and blank spaces. It seems that most
> processors does not handle carriage returns very well without extensions...
The XSLT standard gives you full control over white space output without
using any extensions. So this shouldn't need to be a factor in
determining which processor to use.
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list