This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper
- From: Wendell Piez <wapiez at mulberrytech dot com>
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 19:00:22 -0400
- Subject: [xsl] fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper
- References: < <9B66BBD37D5DD411B8CE00508B69700F4F02FD@pborolocal.rnib.org.uk><9B66BBD37D5DD411B8CE00508B69700F4F02FD@pborolocal.rnib.org.uk>
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Hi all,
I'm wondering about (what may be) a fine point of FO semantics.
Is there something about fo:inline that prevents them from breaking across
lines?
I am seeing this behavior in RenderX XEP (a fine tool), but thought that
inlines could break.
I'm prepared to use fo:wrapper to instigate momentary changes, say, into an
italic face -- but had supposed fo:inline was the right way.
Can anyone shed light on this?
Thanks!
Wendell
======================================================================
Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@mulberrytech.com
Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list