This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: content management stuff - was -> Re: a simple case study


Hi,

Mulberry Technologies List Owner wrote:

>>Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:55:08 -0600
>>From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@havenrock.com>
>>To: xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
>>Subject: Re: content management stuff - was -> Re: [xsl] a simple case study
>>Reply-To: Matt Gushee <mgushee@havenrock.com>
>>
>>>>Yes, this is true. Although it is voluntery to subscribe to this or any
>>>>other list... so the volume is not a prob, as far as I can see. But about
>>>>
>>It's a problem if you care about alienating people who might be valuable
>>contributors to the discussion. One of the people I know who refuses to
>>subscribe is Uche Ogbuji, whose name may be known to many of you. FWIW.
>>
Is the problem more that there are alot of on-topic, but very basic 
questions that can (should...) found in FAQs or books?

This list has not been plagued at with off-topic subjects like many 
other lists. Just look at how the list administrator is actively 
monitoring this thread. It shows a great deal of concern for off-topic 
threads. It also shows he has not made up his mind whether this is 
off-topic.

Content management affects many (most?) of us directly. I wonder how 
many people are rolling their own systems to fit their particular XSL(t) 
needs?? It seems to me that the two go hand in hand.

best,
-Rob



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]