This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: XPath 2.0

From: David Carlisle <davidc at nag dot co dot uk>
To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:23:54 GMT
Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201081621580.3295-100000@mail.idoox.com> <14113160796.20020108160321@jenitennison.com>
Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com


> I might be reading it wrong, but I think that the << operator is
> supposed to cover the combination of ancestor and preceding axes. So
> if you did:

more than that I think: document order orders nodes across documents
(in an implementation way) whereas nodes in different documents are  not
comparable with orderings based on an axes.

(
David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Follow-Ups:
- Re: XPath 2.0
  - From: Jeni Tennison

References:
- XPath 2.0
  - From: Miloslav Nic
- Re: XPath 2.0
  - From: Jeni Tennison

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]