This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

performace diffence in MSXSL:SCRIPT blocks


is there a difference in performance between the following?

1) using CDATA
 <msxsl:script language="VBScript" implements-prefix="user">
<![CDATA[
'---------------------------------------------------------------------
'converts current date to YYYYMMDD format

 function current_date()
  current_date = cstr(date())
 end function

]]>
</msxsl:script>

2) no CDATA
 <msxsl:script language="VBScript" implements-prefix="user">
'---------------------------------------------------------------------
'converts current date to YYYYMMDD format

 function current_date()
  current_date = cstr(date())
 end function
</msxsl:script>


obviously, using the CDATA helps when you are looking at your XSL file from
within IE, but if it is going to cause a performance slowdown, it wouldn't
be worth it.

- todd

Todd Binder
todd_binder@hotmail.com

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]