This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: order of UNIONs


But does this really make sense? select="group[21]|group[1]" means for me
'select the 21st group and add the 1st group'. The existance of position()
or [21] itself show that position and order aren't so unimportant in a
node-set. And if I want to have the created node-set in document-order I can
still use select="group[position() = 21 or position() = 1]". So I must build
a RTF and use the nodeset()-extension-function.

Joerg


> > is it possible to influence the order of a node-set UNION like the
following
>
> No as sets don't have an order (that's why they are called node sets not
> node lists)
>
> David


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]