This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: xslt namespace


Funny enough, that exists (and has been available for over a year).

<http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/default.asp?URL=/code/sample.asp?url=/m
sdn-files/027/000/540/msdncompositedoc.xml>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com]On Behalf Of Daniel
> Veillard
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 5:29 PM
> To: xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
> Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt namespace
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 04:46:47PM +0200, jon wa wrote:
> > my main problem is with the xsl namespace (i know what a
> namespace is). i
> > always use xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"; but
> i also see
> > xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl"; which i assume is a
> working draft. but is
> > WD-xsl xsl or xslt? i'm using the gnome libxsl and it doesn't like the
> > WD-xsl but people keep sending me stuff with WD-xsl in saying
> how simple things
> > aren't working and can i fix it.
>
>   Could Microsoft develop an XSLT stylesheet converting their WD-xsl
> inappropriate implementation into a correct XSLT stylesheet ?
>
>    That would be a correct answer to the problem they are giving
> to the members of this list !
>
> Daniel
>
> --
> Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
> veillard@redhat.com  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
> http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]