This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: XML Schema/XSL conflict (can't differentiate unqualified locals)?
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: Re: [xsl] XML Schema/XSL conflict (can't differentiate unqualified locals)?
- From: "cutlass" <cutlass at secure0 dot com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 12:16:41 +0100
- References: <002e01c15056$646dc6d0$2100a8c0@swiftnet.tec>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
chris bayes pleads;
> PLEASE PLEASE TELL ME. What is it about namespaces that people don't
> understand. I'm sorry guys for shouting but WHAT THE F*** IS IT. Maybe
> this is a cry for help but I really want to understand what the problem
> is here. Maybe I am stupid but what is so difficult to understand?
> I've noticed some PERL ppl posting on the list over the last couple of
> days that could sort out the problem in 2 seconds. Come on guys have a
> poke from a different point of view!!!!!
the idea of mixing xml vocabularies is a natural no brainer for most people.
the problem comes with the slight nuances that are introduced, as MKay
pointed out,with the URI possibly being the most confusing but this has some
implications for future architecture.
the big problem on the list is the confusion the M$ has done with their
early XSL implementation.
i would suggest everyone on the list to suggest to microsoft to make some
very clear distinctions
http://register.microsoft.com/mswish/suggestion.asp?from=cu&fu=%2Fisapi%2Fgo
mscom%2Easp%3Ftarget%3D%2Fmswish%2Fthanks%2Ehtm
choose internet explorer and help and documentation, cut n paste the
following in the comment;
'members of the XSLT list request that you please describe the difference
between the XSL and XSLT namespace within your MSXML documentation.'
maybe this will reduce the number of postings that relate to this or
not......
cheers, jim fuller
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list