This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: RE: apply-templates and excluding a node
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: RE: [xsl] RE: apply-templates and excluding a node
- From: Meltem Kogelbauer <meltem dot kogelbauer at netdecisions dot co dot uk>
- Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 18:04:24 +0100
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Thanks you all
I understand it better now.
-----Original Message-----
From: Wendell Piez [mailto:wapiez@mulberrytech.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 5:24 PM
To: xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: apply-templates and excluding a node
At 11:48 AM 10/4/01, you wrote:
>it is <xsl:apply-templates select="*[not(self::PRFID)]" />
>
>What I do not undestand is why "self" why not "child"? Can anyone explain
>this?
Because the predicate [not(self::PRFID)] is evaluated with respect to the
node set selected by *, taking each of those nodes in turn as its context
node (and returning only those that test true).
Since * has already selected children, you want to check them each on the
self:: axis. If you said *[not(child::PRFID)], or the equivalent
*[not(PRFID)], you'd get all element children that do not themselves have a
PRFID child, as opposed to those that are not them-selves- a PRFID.
Cheers,
Wendell
======================================================================
Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@mulberrytech.com
Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list