This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: working with XSLFO: validation.
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: [xsl] working with XSLFO: validation.
- From: "Max Dunn" <maxdunn at siliconpublishing dot com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 13:15:40 -0700
- Organization: Silicon Publishing
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
I think there are definitely several scenarios in which validation of
XSLFO would be desirable. Doesn't the popularity of the 'RenderX trial
version' of a DTD clearly show that this is a real world need?
Max
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
[mailto:owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com] On Behalf Of Francis
Norton
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:38 AM
To: xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
Subject: Re: [xsl] working with XSLFO: validation.
Tobias Reif wrote:
>
> >> Scenario 2.
<snip schema-guided XML editor>
Scenario 3.
I'd like to offer another scenario - using schema-guided editors to help
create XSLT transforms that consume XSLFO. I've been playing with XML
Spy 4 beta 2 and it has support for building mySchema -> HTML
transforms, using an XML Schema and an instance doc as inputs. It's a
great idea. I'd like to be able to generate mySourceSchema ->
myTargetSchema transforms the same way, this is a very good start.
As a tool development activity, this scenario would presumably be in
scope?
Francis.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list