This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: l "& #xA0; vs & #160;" version 2 proposal.
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: [xsl]l "& #xA0; vs & #160;" version 2 proposal.
- From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay at iclway dot co dot uk>
- Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 09:26:23 +0100
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> Considering the number of questions this raises,
> How many rules would be broken if were added
> to an XSLT engine? I.e. put in as part of the rec?
>
What exactly are you proposing?
Mandating that with the HTML output method, the Unicode character "no-break
space" should always be serialized as " ", perhaps?
My main concern about this is that it would open the floodgates, creating
pressure to standardize other aspects of the serialized output. I think I'd
prefer this to be left to implementers.
Mike Kay
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list