This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Extra xmlns=""


mhkay@iclway.co.uk wrote:

> > I've noticed that some XSLT engines, when converting from XML
> > to XHTML,
> > will insert extra empty xmlns="" attributes into some tags,
> > even though
> > the XSLT script does not tell it to.  The div and hx tags
> > generally get
> > these.  Of course, the file is then not valid XHTML.
>
> This has nothing to do with the output being XHTML, and nothing to do with the specific elements being output.

I didn't think so, but wasn't sure.


> An xmlns="" (I call it a namespace undeclaration) must be output for an element E if the parent node of E has a namespace node with (name = "", value = something other than ""), and if E has no namespace node with name = "". The conditions that cause this situation to arise in the result tree depend entirely on your stylesheet; and of course the XSLT processor doesn't even know that you are trying to produce XHTML.

Uh, I'm afraid I don't follow.  Can you please give an example?

My stylesheet is taking a no-namespace DocBook tree and parsing it into an XHTML file, with a single namespace declaration in the <html> tag, with no namespace prefix (that is, xmlns="whatever the URI is for XHTML").


> If two processors produce output files that are materially different in their namespace declarations, then one of them is wrong.

Does extra namespace undeclaration count as materially different?

--
Larry Garfield
lgarfiel@students.depaul.edu

Do you have a PalmOS Organizer?  Click here to add me to your address book:
http://signature.coola.com/?lgarfiel@students.depaul.edu

-- "If at first you don't succeed, skydiving isn't for you." :-)


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]