This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: xsl:include is necessary after all
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: [xsl] xsl:include is necessary after all
- From: "Evan Lenz" <elenz at xyzfind dot com>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 10:09:11 -0700
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> Not fine. The *-template caught most of the elements since the templates
> from B.xsl had no chance to match anything. So I had to modify
> the xsl:import
> in A.xsl to xsl:include. Since A.xsl was not my invention I would rather
> leave this stylesheet unchanged.
>
> Is this something the WG should consider when developing XSLT 2.0?
Besides breaking existing stylesheets, what sorts of issues would arise if
conflicts were resolved the other way around instead (priority first and
*then* import precedence)?
Evan
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list