This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: XSL Namespaces - confused
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL Namespaces - confused
- From: David Carlisle <davidc at nag dot co dot uk>
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 09:18:03 +0100
- References: <IKELJDJDDLGLEKAFIGDEAEPFCAAA.ralof@gellivare.se>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> In all examples and recommendations (well not all, but most of them)
> they suggest using the http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform ns, but
> that seems to be a bad idea since it is not supported, are those
> recomendations all dated,
You have that entirely backwards. http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform
is the standard XSL language which is supported by all current XSL
systems (Including Microsoft's). http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl is
a completely different incompatible language thatis not supported on any
platform other than Microsoft (and even there only for compatibility
with version 2 of their parser)
> or is there any good reason for using that
> instead of http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl ?
>
Yes.
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list