RE: [xsl] Comment about XSLT Complier?

["Tim Watts" <timw at 3d3 dot com>]

If you would like to see some more benchmark tests there are results at
http://www.datapower.com/XSLTMark/res_2000_11_20.html

Xalan C and Sablotron are the two C++ XSLT Parsers tested there and the
others are Java

Tim Watts

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
[mailto:owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com]On Behalf Of Xu, Xiaocun
Sent: Friday, 16 March 2001 12:50 AM
To: 'xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com'
Subject: RE: [xsl] Comment about XSLT Complier?

> > There are benchmarks on the web which show the XSLTC to be a good
> > performer.
>
> Oh good! Could you point me at a URL for these benchmarks?
> I've seen figures
> for other XSLT processors but not for XSLTC.

Check out http://www.tfi-technology.com/xml/xslbench.html, it has the best
collection of XSLT processors being benchmarked.  From their result, XSLTC
has one of the best in performance.  But be aware of the warning:

The figures for non-conformant engines are likely to be skewed by the fact
that they are non-conformant. In this test the non-conformant engines are
Sun XSLTC and Sabletron. The other engines are either conformant or near
enough that it makes little difference to these tests.


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list