This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: implements-prefix vs implements-namespace
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: [xsl] implements-prefix vs implements-namespace
- From: David Carlisle <davidc at nag dot co dot uk>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 12:24:30 GMT
- References: <9B66BBD37D5DD411B8CE00508B69700F4F0393@pborolocal.rnib.org.uk>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> If I import/include this into a main stylesheet which uses xsl: as the
> prefix, what happens?
Why do you care about the prefix? You can use any prefix you like
you don't even have to use the same prefix within a given file.
<tex:stylesheet xmlns:css="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
xmlns:tex="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
version="1.0"
>
<css:output method="xml" indent="yes"/>
<fo:template match="x"/>
</tex:stylesheet>
is a perfectly valid stylesheet, it doesn't do much though.
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list