This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: RE: syntax sugar for call-template)
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: RE: syntax sugar for call-template)
- From: Jeni Tennison <mail at jenitennison dot com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 18:31:21 +0000
- Organization: Jeni Tennison Consulting Ltd
- References: <000a01c09b4a$82ee14a0$fa363c3e@oemcomputer>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Mike Kay wrote:
> Just an observation: The XSLT 1.1 WD doesn't allow an <exsl:function>
> element to appear inside <sxl:script>, but does allow it at the top level.
> <xsl:script> is declared as #PCDATA.
Well that wasn't very foresightful of the WG, was it?!? ;)
I know. We can still use xsl:script if we just wrap all the
exsl:function elements and so on inside a CDATA section! Problem
solved :)
Jeni
---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list