This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: RE: syntax sugar for call-template
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template
- From: David Carlisle <davidc at nag dot co dot uk>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 23:23:47 GMT
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0102161700420.27462-100000@clarkevans.com>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> Why does it need to be that complicated?
because if you introduce a system for binding XSLT written code to Xpath
functions that _only_ does simple cases eg, not cope with qnames as
function names or node sets as argumnements, then you may find your
options are severly limited when you come to specify the "full job"
if you have to keep compatible with a half way solution that has been
added earlier.
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list