This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: double indirection with keys?
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: [xsl] double indirection with keys?
- From: David Carlisle <davidc at nag dot co dot uk>
- Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 16:57:20 GMT
- References: <3A7ADF19.4B8ADBAD@ofd.mf.lsa-net.de>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> But the XPath-Spec seems to indicate that predicates are not allowed
> inside predicates.
No, they are allowed.
> The relevant pieces of the my source-document
The key you showed had elements from an fo: namespace
what namespace is that (XSL FO?) in any event they didn't appear to be
any such in th einput fragment you showed.
without keys it would appear that you want
<xsl:if test"'fixed' =/*/*/style:font-decl[@style:name=
/*/*/style:style[@style:name=current()/@text:style-name]/@style:font-name
]/@style:font-pitch">
(untested, optimising with keys left as exercise for reader)
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list