This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: Quasi-Literals and XML
- To: "'xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com'" <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: [xsl] Quasi-Literals and XML
- From: Linda van den Brink <lvdbrink at baan dot nl>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:13:05 +0100
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
David Carlisle wrote:
> Of course the comment that you quote
>
> > "XSL is a specialized language built specifically for
> transforming XML, into
> > XML or other notations, but not for transforming other
> notations into XML.
>
> is perfectly valid, and is explictly stated by the XSLT spec.
> So I don't think that is necessarily a "criticism" of xsl, just a
> statement of fact.
I agree with you there. But that quote continues by saying that the most
damaging fact about XSL is that it is not Turing-complete and is therefore
severely restricted in the transformations it can express.
My point is that in the first place the statement that XSL is not
Turing-complete is debatable, in the second place I'm not convinced that XSL
is severely restricted in the possible transformations, and in the third
place I wonder whether there is a causal relationship between lack of
turing-completeness of XSL and restrictions in possible transformations.
Linda
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list