This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: New nntp news group for xsl-fo discussion
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: [xsl] New nntp news group for xsl-fo discussion
- From: Martin Stricker <shugal at gmx dot de>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 01:12:14 +0100
- Organization: http://martin-stricker.de/ http://www.surfo.net/ http://www.masterportal24.com/cgi-bin/YaBB.cgi
- References: <DIEBINDFHPIDBOHGPJJJMEEFCFAA.maxdunn@siliconpublishing.com>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Max Dunn wrote:
> It would be interesting to see how many participants actually use FO
> at all.
I do. :-) Apache's fop, to be exactly. They have a good mailing list,
but it covers fop-specific topics most. I'm missing a general XSL-FO
list where I can discuss the language itself!
> There is definitely a subset of "XSL" users who are interested in
> only the transformation part, and there is also a subset that are
> more focused on (and/or more eager to receive e-mails on an instant
> basis about) FO.
I'm interested in both XSL-T and XSL-FO. But I definitely like them to
be separated from each other, meaning two mailing lists instead of one.
> I would think it best if Mullberrytech either changes this to cover
> just XSLT (referring FO to the eGroups site) or starts an FO list.
Basically the egroups XSL-FO list does the trick, but I would feel more
comfortable with another host than egroups with their limitations.
Mulberrytech has proven themselves a trustworthy host, I would happily
join a XSL-FO list here and end the egroups one.
Best regards,
Martin Stricker
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list