Re: New XSL working draft published

[Rick Geimer <Rick dot Geimer at nsc dot com>]

Nikolai,

Thanks for providing this link. It helps me tremendously. I second
Sebastian's motion that the XSL working group review it and either
approve it, or release a conforming version if they reject it. 

I understand that there are parts of XSL that cannot be represented in
XML syntax, but a DTD can still get you 95% of the way there, which is
much better than nothing. 

Rick Geimer
National Semiconductor
rick.geimer@nsc.com

Nikolai Grigoriev wrote:
> 
> Rick,
> 
> > I complained about the lack of a DTD for XSL-FO to the editors several
> > times, but they seem disinterested in providing one. Perhaps more arm
> > twisting from concerned users and implementors is in order?
> 
> at mid July, we have published a DTD for March 27 XSL FO WD at
> http://www.renderx.com/Tests/validator/fo2000.dtd.html. It was also used by
> FOP team to check their tests. Certainly, it is unofficial - it has not been
> approved (not even commented) by the XSL WG. The WD of yesterday changed
> only slightly from that of March, therefore I hope to publish a revised DTD
> quite soon.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Nikolai Grigoriev
> RenderX
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list