This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: Which engine? (RE: JavaScript and XSL)
- To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: Which engine? (RE: JavaScript and XSL)
- From: Paul Tchistopolskii <paul at qub dot com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 20:30:18 -0700
- Organization: The Qub Group
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Tchistopolskii
> I've tried embedding SAXON ( with Trax ) and I've tried embedding XT.
> The real ( not hypotetical ) situation with embeddability could
> be somehow illustrated by the latest source code of XSLScript
> version 0.7 ( based on SAXON ) and XSLScript version 0.5
> ( based on XT ). Latest distribution of XSLScript contains both things.
Mistake here. XSLScript is not using Trax to embed SAXON.
I confuzed this with another thing I'm writing ( to be published
soon ).
However, the point of 'what was easier to embed in the real life'
remains true.
Rgds.Paul.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list