This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: MSXML Whitespace handling
- To: <xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: MSXML Whitespace handling
- From: "Paulo Gaspar" <paulo dot gaspar at krankikom dot de>
- Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 13:12:56 +0200
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
> I do think your/Mikes finer points should be taken to W3C, but for your
> customers, the choice should be compliance with their expectations.
Completelly agree!
"compliance with their expectations" looks like the key expression for me.
No complains about MSXML architecture.
I just believe that the default value for the
"DOMDocument.preserveWhiteSpace"
property should be TRUE instead of FALSE.
Have fun,
Paulo Gaspar
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@mulberrytech.com]On Behalf Of Pawson, David
> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 10:30
> To: 'xsl-list@mulberrytech.com'
> Subject: RE: MSXML Whitespace handling
>
> I think this provides the focus Andrew. Nearer to 98% of users
> of MSXML will not appreciate the finer points of document load options,
> simply using a tool that MS provides.
> We are repeatedly told that space is preserved within xsl:text elements.
> We use it like that and expect certain outcomes.
> I do think your/Mikes finer points should be taken to W3C, but for your
> customers, the choice should be compliance with their expectations.
>
> Regards DaveP
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list