This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: XSLT engine performance
- To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: RE: XSLT engine performance
- From: "Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus" <Scott_Boag at lotus dot com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 11:26:53 -0400
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
> I couldn't see a command-line switch offhand
Nope, I meant in calling code.
> a missing ID is not a warning, is it?
It's still well formed.
> isnt it mandated by the XML spec? or is that urban myth?
This is in the Xerces code. There's probably an option somewhere to
control it.
-scott
Sebastian Rahtz
<sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxf To: xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
ord.ac.uk> cc: (bcc: Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus)
Sent by: Subject: RE: XSLT engine performance
owner-xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
07/27/2000 10:50 AM
Please respond to xsl-list
Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus writes:
>
> There just validation warningsI think
a missing ID is not a warning, is it?
> ... the XML file is still well formed,
> and can be processed. We just happen to not stop if a validation error
> occurs. We just happen to not specifically stop if a validation warning
> occurs. I think you can override this behavior.
I couldn't see a command-line switch offhand
> In retrospect, it might
> be more correct to stop processing by default if a validation warning
> occurs.
isnt it mandated by the XML spec? or is that urban myth?
Sebastian
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list