This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: asp assistance please (Can we get some POSITIVE suggestions please?)
- To: <xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: asp assistance please (Can we get some POSITIVE suggestions please?)
- From: "Paulo Gaspar" <paulo dot gaspar at krankikom dot de>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 21:34:09 +0200
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
Again, I couldn't agree more.
But then, I already posted my bit of prose under the
"RE: XSL rendering on IE 5" subject.
Have fun,
Paulo Gaspar
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@mulberrytech.com]On Behalf Of Dan Morrison
> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 13:38
> To: xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
> Subject: Re: asp assistance please (Can we get some POSITIVE suggestions
> please?)
>
>
> Ditto.
>
> Please tone it down - I have found that the XML division of MS is
> genuinely well-intentioned, and have done a damn fine job until now of
> keeping up AND deploying a product which many folk are actually finding
> useful in day-to-day practice.
> Whatever you prejudices you may choose to hold, MS is NOT a monolith of
> drones, there are more than a few individuals in there trying to do the
> right thing, and there's more than the usual proportion in the XML
> division this year :-)
>
> It was ALWAYS understood - by anyone who actually bothered to read up -
> that last years MSXML implimentation was only partial - as were most
> equivalent products at the time IE4 was released!
> The spec didn't even exist then, remember?
>
> The terms "pre-release", "beta" and "web release" do actually imply
> "caveat emptor" (although I too am unsure just what "Web Release"
> actually means!)
>
>
> Don't blame the manufacturer for only documenting what they wanted you
> to know - blame the dolts who have NEVER visited XML.com or W3C, read
> any industry mags or checked out any of the newsgroups or discussion
> lists. Complaining you are misinformed is just a case of _willful_
> ignorance, so drop it.
>
> It doesn't take five minutes of websearching to get aware that there are
> compatibility issues between different products.
>
> C, HTML, Java - some of the most widly deployed 'language standards'
> have all and always had platform issues, quirks and work-arounds. Yes
> they should be ironed out, but give up knocking the pre-releases.
> If anyone ever claims a 100% bug-free money-back guaranteed
> fully-compliant parser - sue them. Until then keep the money you paid
> out for MSXML (how much was it?) in your pocket.
>
> ... sorry. I'm just getting fed up with this dead horse being pushed
> around the group AGAIN this week.
>
> .dan.
>
> :=====================:====================:
> : Dan Morrison : The Web Limited :
> : http://here.is/dan : http://web.co.nz :
> : dman@es.co.nz : danm@web.co.nz :
> : 04 384 1472 : 04 495 8250 :
> : 025 207 1140 : :
> :.....................:....................:
> : If ignorance is bliss, why aren't more people happy?
> :.........................................:
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list