This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Machine-readable comments (Was: How is this part of the XSLT specificationto be interpreted?)
- To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Machine-readable comments (Was: How is this part of the XSLT specificationto be interpreted?)
- From: David_Marston at lotus dot com
- Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 14:05:39 -0400
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
Mike Brown says:
>Comments are not required to be reported by an XML parser, so you should
>never depend on being able to process them with XSLT.
Isn't that a little harsh? If I know what parser I'll be using, and I
know that the stylesheets won't be going to a place where an unknown
parser is used, why not have specially-structured comments? Recall that
<xsl:template match="comment()" />
is valid in XSLT, so the Working Group must have thought that the
above would work in many common parser/processor situations, and
indeed it does.
.................David Marston
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list