This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: How is this part of the XSLT specification to be interpreted?

To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
Subject: Re: How is this part of the XSLT specification to be interpreted?
From: David Carlisle <davidc at nag dot co dot uk>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 12:34:39 +0100 (BST)
References: <3.0.6.32.20000620182155.01209500@NTServer><3.0.6.32.20000620182155.01209500@NTServer> <3.0.6.32.20000621100831.01217ea0@NTServer>
Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com



> Of these ways, the first is the purest, probably (though it's a bit
> annoying having to use xsl:fallback).

It is perhaps less annoying if you put the xslt instruction that you are
documenting _inside_ the fallback.

David


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Follow-Ups:
- Re: How is this part of the XSLT specification to be interpreted?
  - From: Jeni Tennison

References:
- RE: How is this part of the XSLT specification to be interpreted?
  - From: Jeni Tennison
- Re: How is this part of the XSLT specification to be interpreted?
  - From: Jeni Tennison

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]