This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: PassiveTeX, TEI XSL stylesheets updated
- To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: RE: PassiveTeX, TEI XSL stylesheets updated
- From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian dot rahtz at computing-services dot oxford dot ac dot uk>
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 09:25:15 +0100 (BST)
- References: <39B19660C174D311BB9000A0C9E01C3F317DAF@corfu.rnib.org.uk>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
Pawson, David writes:
> > http://users.ox.ac.uk/~rahtz/passivetex: an implementation of XSL FOs
> > using TeX
>
> Nice one Sebastian. Even documentation!
a hit, a very palpable hit...
> From previous DSSSL comments, is it a reasonable
> expectation that there are a number of package dependencies?
> Perhaps a listing of package and version needed? Or an even
> simpler 'Tex live version X' as a complete entity.
I will prepare a list of packages and versions and add to the
documentation. Yes, if you are not 100% up to date, you lose and go
back to square on.
I should say that I anticipate making a dependency on one of the
extended TeXs (eTeX or Omega) shortly, in order to cope with
non-left-to-right scripts. I would like to use Omega, as it also does
Unicode internally. This should cut out 99% of the existing TeX people
who do not have Omega on their system :-}
Sebastian
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list