This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: XLST Processors Performace
- To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: XLST Processors Performace
- From: Petr Cimprich <petr at gingerall dot cz>
- Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 11:24:05 +0200
- Organization: Ginger Alliance s.r.o.
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10005090051050.5775-100000@hesseth.int.novator.com>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
Steve,
Sablotron should be taken as an alpha release.
The main features missing in sablotron 0.33 include:
xsl:key,
xsl:number,
xsl:fallback,
xsl:import,
xsl:sort.
The complete comparation of current version to the W3C specs is on
http://www.gingerall.com/charlie-bin/get/webGA/act/sablot_man.act
If you need some of these features now, you have to use another
processor. Missing features of course help sablotron to be a little bit
faster but even when completed, a compiled C program still should be
faster than Java etc.
Petr
Steve Willer wrote:
> On Tue, 9 May 2000, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>
> > obviously, the other XSLT processors (MS, Oracle C version, the
> > gingerall one), however laudable in some ways, simply lack all the
> > necessary language features.
>
> This is surprising to me, and is of particular interest because I was
> planning to use gingerall's Sablotron due to its speed and apparent
> completeness. Could you elaborate on what you think is missing and
> essential?
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
--
Petr Cimprich
Ginger Alliance Ltd.
www.gingerall.com
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list