This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: xsl:copy problem
- To: "'xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com'" <xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: xsl:copy problem
- From: Kay Michael <Michael dot Kay at icl dot com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 09:24:43 +0100
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
> which is more efficient - using the xsl:variable as
> suggested below or using the current() function?
Speaking for Saxon only: I think it's very unlikely to make any measurable
difference. Using current() is probably a microsecond or two faster, unless
you need the variable for other reasons anyway.
Mike Kay
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list