This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

RE: "Translate function"


So although you are not saying that
saxon is better, it is however the 
latest state of the art model vehicle 
on the street.  If it works better is more
of matter of opinion.  

Thanks once again Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@nag.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 2:45 PM
To: xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
Subject: Re: "Translate function"



> Does it work better than saxon?  

What sort of question is that:-)

Since the author of each of these packages is on this list, what can I say?

xt was first, because it is written by the editor of the xslt spec.
Saxon is currently more complete (has keys for instance)
I have xt saxon xalan and oracle's xsl system installed (and if i drag
myself out of my desk I can find a machine running some strange
operating system that is apparently required to use msxsl preview
release) I use xt usually, probably because it is less to type.

David


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]