This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: Microsoft XSL and Conformance
- To: "'xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com'" <xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: Microsoft XSL and Conformance
- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh at microsoft dot com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 09:11:12 -0800
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
Awesome move, Andy! Amazing how quick the mob dispersed...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Kimball [mailto:akimball@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 1:37 AM
> To: xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
> Subject: Microsoft XSL and Conformance
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm Andy Kimball, the Microsoft XSL developer. After today's "nested
> template abomination" discussion, I had a couple of comments. First,
> Microsoft is committed to delivering a conformant XSLT
> processor. If you
> don't believe "Microsoft", then at least believe me. I'm
> writing the thing.
> I've often gritted my teeth and implemented some feature that
> I thought was
> inelegant, less than useful, or arbitrarily limited, just to
> be compliant.
> As I receive feedback from the XSL community, I've been
> surprised at how
> vocal and passionate people are about conformance (of course,
> people also
> want performance, scalability, and usability without any
> trade-offs, and
> they want it yesterday--unrealistic, but understandable).
> Now, I may not be
> able to cross every tiny 't', and dot every insignificant
> 'i', but I will
> make a good-faith effort to implement according to the 1.0
> spec. If you
> find conformance problems that concern you, feel free to e-mail me at
> akimball@microsoft.com.
>
> ~Andy Kimball
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list