This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: XSLT vs Omnimark
- To: "'xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com'" <xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: XSLT vs Omnimark
- From: Jonathan Asbell <jonathana at raremedium dot com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 13:22:10 -0500
- Reply-To: xsl-list at mulberrytech dot com
I have been following this converstaion and am interested as to what
productive conclusion I can draw in implementing xsl. Obviously we all need
the fastest method, yet one that follows standards. Please advise
(the silent mediator)
-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Geimer [mailto:Rick.Geimer@nsc.com]
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2000 12:39 PM
To: xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
Subject: Re: XSLT vs Omnimark
Didier PH Martin wrote:
> So Paul, Omnimark is nearer to XSLT concepts than PERL. To compare PERL
with
> XSLT is like comparing potatoes with oranges but comparing Omnimark to
XSLT
> is like comparing two kinds of oranges.
>
Actually, comparing XSLT to OmniMark is like comparing an orange tree to
a bunch of oranges coming down a high speed assembly line, but I
digress... :-)
Rick Geimer
National Semiconductor
rick.geimer@nsc.com
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list