This is the mail archive of the
xconq7@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Xconq project.
Re: Implementing cxp-on-completion?
- From: Eric McDonald <mcdonald at phy dot cmich dot edu>
- To: Lincoln Peters <sampln at sbcglobal dot net>
- Cc: Xconq list <xconq7 at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 14:53:46 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: Implementing cxp-on-completion?
> property, because this could be checked/applied during initial
> unit replacement, unit creation, unit change type, arrival of
Er, that should read "placement", not "replacement". I was
thinking of REinforcements when I was attempting to write
"placement".
I guess I should see if Cisco, Nortel, et al. have any available
upgrades for my neurological switching gear....
> reinforcments, etc..., whereas a 'size-on-change-type' (or
Eric