This is the mail archive of the
xconq7@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Xconq project.
RE: xconq gnatsweb
- From: "Erik Jessen" <ejessen at adelphia dot net>
- To: "'Eric McDonald'" <emcdonal at cps dot cmich dot edu>,"'Jim Kingdon'" <kingdon at panix dot com>
- Cc: <xconq7 at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 21:16:31 -0700
- Subject: RE: xconq gnatsweb
We use Bugzilla at work; it's not perfect, but it does the job.
We really don't have tons of bugs in Xconq, but we found (at work) that
Bugzilla is also handy for tracking enhancement requests, "features",
etc.
Erik
-----Original Message-----
From: xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com
[mailto:xconq7-owner@sources.redhat.com] On Behalf Of Eric McDonald
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 10:01 AM
To: Jim Kingdon
Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: xconq gnatsweb
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Jim Kingdon wrote:
> I looked at bug 4 and it seems to already be fixed. But I don't know
> how to log in to gnats. The whole thing seems to be rather less easy
> to use than bugzilla...
I think the gcc people switched over to bugzilla a while ago, and for a
fairly
large open source community like that to make the switch, bugzilla must
have
some merit over the others....
If no one is planning on maintaining a defect tracking system, then I
suppose we
should submit PR's to the list?