This is the mail archive of the xconq7@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Xconq project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Xconq for Windows

From: Hans Ronne <hronne at telia dot com>
To: Jim Kingdon <kingdon at panix dot com>
Cc: xconq7 at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 23:56:45 +0200
Subject: Re: Xconq for Windows
References: <l03130300b9da12b1e7ee@[212.181.162.155]> (message from HansRonne on Mon, 21 Oct 2002 22:38:49 +0200)<15796.8451.170000.121255@lapjr.intranet.kiel.bmiag.de> (message fromJuergen Ruehle on Mon, 21 Oct 2002 17:45:07 +0200)<l03130302b9d35b2cee67@[212.181.162.155]><15796.8451.170000.121255@lapjr.intranet.kiel.bmiag.de><l03130300b9da12b1e7ee@[212.181.162.155]>

>> I have been thinking about moving the relevant parts of x11/xconq.c
>> into a new tcltk/tkunix.c file for the same reason (just like I did
>> with wconq.c). And then make the tcltk app for unix build in the tcltk
>> directory. The x11 directory should only contain xtconq sources.
>
>I like this one a lot.  xtconq and the unix tcltk xconq don't share
>enough code to justify the current setup, which is confusing.  I'd
>just copy stuff over (and not worry about duplicating it; x11/xconq.c
>is s small file).

Yes. You would of course still need x11/xconq.c to build xtconq. I think
there is some x11-specific stuff in it, though, that we could do without in
a tcltk/tkunix.c copy.

Hans

References:
- Re: Xconq for Windows
  - From: Hans Ronne
- Re:Xconq for Windows
  - From: Juergen Ruehle
- Re: Xconq for Windows
  - From: Jim Kingdon

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]