This is the mail archive of the xconq7@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Xconq project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Death of an advanced unit

From: Hans Ronne <hronne at pp dot sbbs dot se>
To: Lincoln Peters <peters2000 at mindspring dot com>
Cc: xconq7 at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 08:19:49 +0200
Subject: Re: Death of an advanced unit
References: <l03130300b93555402772@[217.115.38.216]><l03130300b93555402772@[217.115.38.216]>

>On Tue, 2002-06-18 at 14:25, Hans Ronne wrote:
>> I have now checked in a fix of the moving advanced unit problem. Please
>> check if it also eliminated your segfaults.
>
>Nope, it keeps segfaulting.  I am now convinced that the problems are
>unrelated.
>
>The floating-city still won't move if it's acp-independent, but it seems
>to work fine if it's advanced but not acp-independent.  It's showing no
>signs of bugs.

This is as it should be. acp-independent units don't have acps, so there is
no way for them to do anything except build new units. Which is not limited
by available acps. If they could move, they would move for ever.

Hans

Hans Ronne

hronne@pp.sbbs.se

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Death of an advanced unit
  - From: Lincoln Peters

References:
- Re: Death of an advanced unit
  - From: Hans Ronne
- Re: Death of an advanced unit
  - From: Lincoln Peters

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]