side_controls_unit vs. tk interface
Stan Shebs
shebs@shebs.cnchost.com
Fri Oct 6 08:41:00 GMT 2000
Jim Kingdon wrote:
>
> Here's the latest in the saga which started with
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/xconq7/2000/msg00105.html - which is
> basically trying to clean up the side_sees_unit vs. side_controls_unit
> in tkcmd.c. The enclosed code is similar in spirit to existing
> side_controls_unit calls in tkcmd.c; it just goes more places.
The theory is good, but is there some reason the test can't go into
REQUIRE_UNIT? The macro is local to this file, and intended to
reduce this kind of replication, so it seems like the perfect home.
Stan
More information about the Xconq7
mailing list