This is the mail archive of the
xconq7@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Xconq project.
Re: defense of places by occupants...
- To: Bruno Boettcher <bboett@yoda.u-strasbg.fr>
- Subject: Re: defense of places by occupants...
- From: Keir Novik <ken21@cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 6 Sep 1997 12:22:49 +0100 (BST)
- cc: xconq7@cygnus.com
On Fri, 5 Sep 1997, Bruno Boettcher wrote:
> On another case i had a base with 12 (!) armors in it, and it got
> taken by 1 adverse armor + a bomber.... even if i assume that every
> shot hit, the two havn't enough ammo to achieve this... and where
> was the defense from the occupants??
Unless the occupants provide 100% protection for the transport, the
transport can still be captured before the occupants are destroyed.
In the standard game, all units in the city are lost when it's
captured. I agree -- in my experience it's better to defend from
outside cities.
- Keir