This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tapsets/15219] syscall.exp failures on RHEL5, RHEL6, and rawhide


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15219

David Smith <dsmith at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #13 from David Smith <dsmith at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to David Smith from comment #12)
> Created attachment 7262 [details]
> simpler patch
> 
> Here's a simpler version of the last patch that just fixes one syscall.exp
> failure for the 32-bit 'clock' subtest when run on rawhide x86_64. This
> simpler patch should make this approach easier to review and understand.
> 
> Note that we'd have to make similar changes to nd_syscalls.stp.
> 
> Also, it might make sense to combine the syscall.clock_nanosleep and
> syscall.compat_clock_settime probe aliases with their 'compat' probe aliases.

I've made changes to the syscall tapsets to implement this idea. At this point,
the syscall.exp and nd_syscall.exp testcases pass on every platform I've tested
on.

(Note that these changes don't really fix *all* nested syscall problems, just
the ones tested by the testsuite. To catch more failures, we'd need to expand
the testsuite.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]