This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Enhanced Garbage Collection Probe Points

From: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>
To: Jon VanAlten <jvanalte at redhat dot com>
Cc: Andrew Hughes <gnu dot andrew at redhat dot com>, systemtap at sourceware dot org, distro-pkg-dev at openjdk dot java dot net, Lukas Berk <lberk at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:03:05 +0100
Subject: Re: [RFC] Enhanced Garbage Collection Probe Points
References: <561523661.6232111.1351170539693.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> <1299938704.3549181.1351561757214.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 09:49:17PM -0400, Jon VanAlten wrote:
> We reached the conclusion (I believe) that it would be best to
> wait and hear from Mark about plans referred to in email archive
> link below.  Mark, do you have any comment here?  Would it be
> for the best to revert here and apply instead to 7 forest?

Adding patches directly to the tree is fine with me.
My only hesitation was my own confusion since the default
configure/make setup doesn't pick up a patched forest.
You don't have that issue with patches, which are directly
applied. If we are going for a complete forest setup it
might make sense to also add the tapsets and testsuite
directly there.

I'll try and figure it all out again and also port the existing
patches to the forest. Hints and tips appreciated.

Cheers,

Mark

References:
- Re: [RFC] Enhanced Garbage Collection Probe Points
  - From: Andrew Hughes
- Re: [RFC] Enhanced Garbage Collection Probe Points
  - From: Jon VanAlten

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]