This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Error removing module: Device or resource busy

From: fche at redhat dot com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
To: Chris Dunlop <chris at onthe dot net dot au>
Cc: Josh Stone <jistone at redhat dot com>, systemtap at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 07:31:07 -0500
Subject: Re: Error removing module: Device or resource busy
References: <20111223050020.GA11829@onthe.net.au> <4EF4E089.6060008@redhat.com> <20111225235927.GA2907@onthe.net.au> <4EF8BDF6.2070105@redhat.com> <20111228080728.GA12001@onthe.net.au> <4F1A1244.3010908@redhat.com> <20120121013535.GA8165@onthe.net.au> <20120121023012.GA8844@onthe.net.au> <4F1A68CB.8000409@redhat.com> <20120123072452.GA11940@onthe.net.au>

Chris Dunlop <chris@onthe.net.au> writes:

> [...]
> Aha! That's done the trick.

Could you save/compare the same script compiled on one machine
vs. the other, so we can try to figure out what makes the two
gcc versions incompatible in this way?

- FChE

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Error removing module: Device or resource busy
  - From: Chris Dunlop

References:
- Re: Error removing module: Device or resource busy
  - From: Josh Stone
- Re: Error removing module: Device or resource busy
  - From: Chris Dunlop
- Re: Error removing module: Device or resource busy
  - From: Chris Dunlop
- Re: Error removing module: Device or resource busy
  - From: Josh Stone
- Re: Error removing module: Device or resource busy
  - From: Chris Dunlop

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]