This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug translator/12427] New: implied process("...") target for stap -c CMD invocation


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12427

           Summary: implied process("...") target for stap -c CMD
                    invocation
           Product: systemtap
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: translator
        AssignedTo: systemtap@sources.redhat.com
        ReportedBy: fche@redhat.com


A user observed the redundancy of usage like

stap -e 'probe process("a.out")...., process("a.out").... {}' -c a.out

We should support a heuristic that fills in missing process names into:

   probe process.function("...")

for -c a.out type usage.  This would require parsing the CMDLINE a bit.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]