This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
[Bug runtime/11641] FAIL: fib (19 1) backtrace from uretprobe fails
- From: "fche at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 11 Jun 2010 19:43:00 -0000
- Subject: [Bug runtime/11641] FAIL: fib (19 1) backtrace from uretprobe fails
- References: <20100528110745.11641.mjw@redhat.com>
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
------- Additional Comments From fche at redhat dot com 2010-06-11 19:43 -------
> The reference of GET_PC_URETPROBE_NONE in stack.c is guarded by
> STAPCONF_UPROBE_GET_PC. As for others in uprobe/*, seems not necessary.
But there is another reference in tapsets.cxx.
> I tried the patch on FC13 and upstream linus kernel. No building break found.
Yes, but I was referring to the utrace-less uprobes variant.
But anyway, I'd like to understand why this patch makes a difference.
What code behaves differently for a kretprobe_instance* == 0 vs -1, and why?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11641
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.